The upcoming by-election in the 28–Koridang Assembly Constituency, scheduled for 9th April, presents not just a routine political exercise but a powerful moment of reflection and responsibility for the people. Elections are often seen as contests of power, but in reality, they are opportunities for citizens to shape their future, define their priorities, and set standards for governance. This by-election, though limited in tenure, carries immense significance in demonstrating the maturity and integrity of democratic participation in the constituency.
At the heart of this election lies a simple yet profound choice: whether to uphold the true spirit of democracy or to allow it to be influenced by short-term temptations like money, gifts, or pressure. Vote buying has long been a concern in many electoral processes, but Koridang now has the chance to rise above such practices. By refusing to sell votes and instead voting based on merit, vision, and integrity, the people can send a strong message not only within the constituency but across the entire state that democracy cannot be compromised.
In a democratic society, every individual has the right to vote according to their own preference. This freedom is fundamental and must be respected at all levels, even within families. It is natural for differences of opinion to exist. In fact, such diversity in thought is a sign of a healthy democracy. Within the same household, family members may support different candidates based on their personal beliefs, priorities, or experiences. This should not be a cause of conflict but rather an opportunity to engage in meaningful discussions and understand different perspectives. Democracy thrives not in uniformity, but in respectful disagreement.
However, elections often bring with them heightened emotions, and unfortunately, these emotions sometimes lead to undesirable consequences such as violence, intimidation, or even practices like booth capturing. These actions not only undermine the integrity of the electoral process but also damage the social fabric of the community. It is important to remember that once the election is over, life goes on. Neighbors will continue to live side by side, friends will continue to meet, and communities will continue to function together. Resorting to violence over political differences only creates long-lasting divisions and bitterness. The question we must ask ourselves is simple, is it worth it?
This by-election becomes even more significant because of the diversity of candidates contesting. With six candidates in the fray representing different political parties as well as independent voices—voters are presented with a wide range of choices. This is not a limitation but a strength. Each candidate brings their own vision, priorities, and approach to leadership. Some may represent established party ideologies, while others may bring fresh perspectives as independents. This variety allows voters to carefully evaluate and compare, to ask important questions, and to make informed decisions. Such a situation encourages a more thoughtful and issue-based election. Instead of blindly following party lines or external influences, voters can focus on the qualities of the candidates, their integrity, their past work, their connection with the people, and their plans for the future. It is a rare and valuable opportunity to choose not just a representative, but a leader who truly understands and prioritizes the needs of the constituency.
An important aspect to consider is that the elected candidate will serve for less than two years. At first glance, this may seem like a short period, but in reality, it can be a time of meaningful impact. A committed and proactive representative can achieve a great deal even within a limited timeframe. Development initiatives can be initiated, pressing issues can be addressed, and the voices of the people can be effectively represented in the legislative assembly.
Moreover, whether the elected candidate belongs to the ruling party or sits in the opposition, their role remains crucial. If part of the ruling party, they have the advantage of easier access to resources and decision-making channels, which can be used to bring development projects and benefits to the constituency. On the other hand, if in the opposition, they have the responsibility to question, to hold the government accountable, and to ensure that the concerns of the people are not ignored. A strong opposition is just as important as a strong government in a democracy. In fact, sometimes opposition leaders play a more vocal and active role in highlighting issues and pushing for change. Therefore, voters should not underestimate the impact a candidate can have simply based on their political position. What truly matters is their dedication, honesty, and willingness to serve.
This by-election is also an opportunity for the people of Koridang to set an example for others. By conducting themselves with dignity, by rejecting corrupt practices, and by maintaining peace and unity, they can demonstrate what a true democratic process looks like. Such an example can inspire other constituencies and contribute to strengthening the democratic culture of the entire state.
In conclusion, the by-election in Koridang is more than just a political event—it is a test of values, responsibility, and vision. It is a chance for every voter to rise above personal gain and think about the collective good. Let this election be remembered not for conflict or controversy, but for integrity, unity, and wise decision-making. Each vote cast is not just a choice of a candidate, but a statement of principles. Let the people of Koridang choose wisely, act responsibly, and show that true democracy lies in the power of informed, peaceful, and honest participation.
(The views expressed are those of the writer and not of the newspaper.)
