Nagaland is home to numerous associations and organizations representing various sections of society, including youth, women, and students – so much so that some argue the formation of any more unions should be banned. However, despite being a predominantly agrarian state – where nearly 70% of the population depends on agriculture – it is surprising that there is no dedicated organization representing farmers. This glaring gap calls for immediate attention and action to empower the farming community, ensure their welfare, and amplify their voices in policy discussions.
Farmers in Nagaland face multiple challenges, including a lack of access to institutional credit, forcing them to struggle without respite or rely on high-interest private loans. Additionally, issues such as spurious agricultural inputs, erratic weather conditions, and an inadequate social security net further aggravate their struggles. While various social organizations attempt to address these concerns, their efforts remain scattered and lack coordinated representation at the state and national levels.
A strong, unified farmers’ organization is essential to addressing these concerns effectively. Such an entity could function as an umbrella forum encompassing grassroots farmers’ groups, cooperatives, Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs), and self-help groups. Drawing inspiration from national organizations like the Federation of All India Farmer Associations (FAIFA) and the All India Farmers Alliance (AIFA), Nagaland needs a structured body to engage in policy debates, research-based advocacy, and lobbying with government agencies.
Beyond addressing grievances, a farmers’ organization could also play a crucial role in capacity-building, self-reliance, and poverty reduction. By facilitating access to government schemes, promoting sustainable farming practices, and ensuring the timely availability of resources, it can uplift small and marginal farmers, making agriculture more viable and profitable.
The formation of such an organization is not just desirable but also imperative. The government, civil society, and farmers must work together to establish a representative body that truly works for the interests of Nagaland’s agrarian community. It is high time the farmers of Nagaland had a strong, united voice to shape their future. On the same note, even if an organization is not feasible, there should at least be a farmer advocacy group.
The only hitch is that it could be hijacked by political lackeys or individuals with vested interests.