Livestock farming is a crucial aspect of rural livelihoods in Nagaland, yet it remains largely unstructured and vulnerable to disease outbreaks. Many farmers, often from economically weaker backgrounds, suffer severe losses when epidemics like African Swine Fever (ASF) strike. The question here is — why is scientific farming not widely adopted? Is it due to cultural practices, the small-scale nature of farming, or the perceived cost of modern methods? Or is it simply not practically viable?
A recent training session conducted by the Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA) in Mokokchung sheds light on the importance of biosecurity and disease prevention. Experts suggested simple, affordable measures such as quarantining new livestock, sanitation, controlled farm access, and proper disposal of dead animals. Yet, despite their effectiveness, these practices are not commonly implemented.
The reluctance to embrace scientific methods could stem from multiple factors, like limited awareness, lack of resources, or the mindset that traditional methods are sufficient. However, as diseases continue to wipe out livelihoods, small-scale farmers must recognize that scientific approaches are not just for large commercial farms but are essential for sustainability.
The government and agricultural bodies must actively promote awareness, provide financial incentives, and make veterinary services more accessible. Farmers, too, must be open to change, realizing that modern techniques are not a threat to tradition but a means of securing their future. If scientific farming is not made mainstream, the cycle of disease outbreaks and financial instability will continue to plague Nagaland’s livestock sector.