In democratic societies, elections are supposed to stand as pivotal moments where the collective conscience converges to shape the future. Beyond the mechanics of ballots and political campaigns lies a deeper undercurrent that intertwines morality, ethics, and societal values. Unfortunately, evidence suggests that the manner in which elections are conducted in Nagaland is ludicrous.
At its essence, an election is not merely a procedural exercise but a moral choice. It is a moment when citizens, armed with their convictions and principles, cast their votes not just for policies but for the character and integrity of leaders. The moral dimension of elections hinges on the alignment between personal values and political actions. Voters are tasked with discerning not only what is expedient but what is right for the common good. This begs the question of morality among voters in Nagaland.
Ethics, too, play a crucial role in electoral processes. It demands transparency, honesty, and fairness from candidates and institutions alike. Ethical lapses, from misinformation to corruption, corrode trust in the electoral system. Upholding ethical standards ensures that the outcomes of elections reflect the genuine will of the people, free from undue influence and manipulation. Like morality, the question is how ethical the electoral practices in Nagaland are today.
Moreover, elections serve as a barometer of societal health. They mirror the prevailing values and aspirations of a community, reflecting its stance on issues ranging from justice and equality to prosperity, development, and sustainability. In this context, electoral outcomes are not just numbers but indicators of where a society stands in its collective journey towards a better future.
The interplay of elections with morality, ethics, and society and its resultant manifestation in Nagaland is there for everybody to judge. The prevalent practice of electoral corruption in Nagaland, fueled by echo chambers and misinformation, erodes shared values and deepens societal divides. The rise of ‘might is right’ proves the fragility of democratic norms, testing the moral resilience of Naga society.
Elections are not ends in themselves but means to uphold the values that define us as a people. As urban Nagaland goes to the polls today, we will be our own witness to where Naga society stands.