The rule of law is the bedrock of a just and democratic society, ensuring that all individuals, organizations, and government bodies are held accountable under a common legal framework. It guarantees fairness, protects fundamental rights, and prevents arbitrary governance. However, for the rule of law to be effective, citizens must actively seek justice through legal means rather than relying solely on public statements or informal protests.
In Nagaland, it is common for organizations and pressure groups to issue press releases demanding action on various issues. While public statements can help raise awareness, they seldom lead to lasting resolutions. The results, if any, are often temporary, and authorities may disregard or delay responses. In contrast, legal recourse through Public Interest Litigation (PIL) provides a more structured and enforceable path to justice.
A recent case highlights the power of PIL. The Kohima Bench of the Gauhati High Court intervened after a citizen filed a PIL to ensure continued healthcare services under the Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY) and the Chief Minister Health Insurance Scheme (CMHIS).
The judicial system, despite its procedural delays and costs, remains the most reliable means of seeking justice. Courts operate within a framework that compels authorities to act, enforces accountability, and ensures that decisions are binding. While filing a PIL requires legal expertise and commitment, the long-term benefits far outweigh the initial challenges.
To build a stronger and more accountable society, it is crucial to cultivate a culture of PIL in Nagaland. Citizens, civil society organizations, and legal professionals must take the initiative to challenge injustices through the courts rather than relying solely on press statements. Legal action not only compels authorities to act but also sets legal precedents that can benefit future generations.
PIL can be an effective tool in compelling institutions to fulfill their obligations. Nagaland must embrace this legal mechanism as a fundamental part of civic activism. By choosing judicial interventions over press statements, ultimatums, and protests, the people can ensure lasting solutions and uphold the rule of law for the greater good of society.