History offers countless examples of young people who transformed societies, challenged norms, and inspired movements that still resonate today. From Joan of Arc, who led France to pivotal victories at the age of 17, to Alexander the Great, who built one of the largest empires in history before turning 33, youth has always been synonymous with action and strength. John Keats, the English Romantic poet, died at 25 but left a legacy that continues to influence literature. Mozart, the Austrian composer, passed away at 35 yet his music still moves the world. Young people have always been agents of change in every field of human endeavor.
Just look at what is happening in Nepal, where Gen Z toppled the government. Or take Bangladesh, where students ‘revolted’ against their government in July of last year. These examples show that age is no barrier to impact, and that energy, creativity, and courage in youth can bring about change.
In Nagaland, the situation is different but equally urgent. Here, as in many traditional societies, older generations control most of the political, economic, and social power. While experience and wisdom are essential, keeping young people on the sidelines slows progress. Too often, young people are dismissed as expendable, their ideas sidelined, and their energy constrained. In a fast-changing world of technology, social innovation, and global connections, shutting out half its population is not only unjust but also detrimental to the society’s progress.
Of course, the solution does not lie in confrontation or violence; it lies in intellectual courage and moral clarity. It requires critical thinking and commitment. Young people in Nagaland must speak up, ask questions, present solutions, and remain persistent. They must engage in debates, contribute to policy discussions, lead community initiatives, and use modern tools to ensure their voices are heard. The older generation may be reluctant to relinquish control, but change does not require their permission; it requires persistence, knowledge, and a vision for a better future.
Societies that harness the energy, creativity, and idealism of youth thrive, while those that shut them out stagnate. Naga society stands at a critical point. The question is not whether the youth can make a difference (they unquestionably can) but whether they will rise to the occasion and take responsibility for shaping the future.
