“My family is in Sagaing Division in Burma, in Tirap, Changlang, and Longding of Arunachal Pradesh, and also in Mon District, Nagaland,” says Former ENPO President, Warning of Cultural and Refugee Crisis from Border Fencing

The Angh’s house in Longwa, Nagaland straddles the border between India and Myanmar. (Photo: nexplore)

The proposed security fence along the 1,643-kilometer India-Myanmar border threatens to sever centuries-old ties between families spread across India and Myanmar. Speaking on Cluster of MFI, a YouTube channel, former president of the Eastern Nagaland People’s Organization (ENPO), Khoiwang Wangsha, highlighted how his own family, spread across Sagaing Division in Myanmar as well as Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland, would be affected by the fence.

“Our families—we keep meeting during the Aoleang Festival as a form of cultural exchange; we share a deep-rooted brotherhood,” Wangsha said. He stressed that this cultural connection would be severely impacted if the Government of India proceeds with constructing the border security fence, adding that all of Eastern Nagaland will be significantly impacted.

“For instance, Pangsha village lies on the international border. Their village is in Nagaland, India, but their fields are on the Burmese side, where they have been farming for years,” he explained, drawing attention to the border’s practical implications on the livelihood of border communities.

He recalled that this issue first arose during his tenure as ENPO president in 2017: “The same issue came up when I was the ENPO president in 2017, and we appealed to stop it even back then. I am shocked they have brought it up again.”

Wangsha further highlighted other villages affected by the proposed fence, stating, “Most of Yongkhao village lies in Myanmar. There are also Pesao village, Monyakshu, Wangti, Changlangshu, Chenmoho, and Longwa. If security fencing is built, it will cause huge problems for all these villages,” he said, expressing his shock and dissatisfaction over the Centre’s decision to proceed with the fencing.

He explained that the “imaginary” line between India and Myanmar was drawn in 1972 without consultation with local landowners or residents. “This line was decided solely by Rangoon (Now Yangon) and New Delhi based on watershed boundaries,” he noted, adding, “Now this imaginary line has become an international border.”

Wangsha warned of a potential refugee crisis if the fence proceeds. “Without land, we cannot live. Just look at how Bangladeshis are migrating to India without their land; this is already causing huge problems, and India is trying to stop them from entering the Northeastern states. If we leave our fields in Burma and stay only in Nagaland, we will have no other option but to set up refugee camps,” he warned.

Questioning the government’s rationale, which cites insurgency as a key reason for the fencing, Wangsha argued, “If the Naga political movement did not exist, there would be no underground movement. If they don’t want the underground movement, they should respect the decisions of the Naga people. Just because of underground movement the logic to make Indo-Myanmar border fencing should not happen.”

The former president appealed for greater understanding from both the India and the Myanmar sides.

MT

40 thoughts on “Fencing the border, breaking families: A call to rethink India’s Indo-Myanmar border fencing”
  1. at web, except I know I am getting familiarity all the time by reading thes pleasant posts.|Fantastic post. I will also be handling some of these problems.|Hello, I think this is a great blog. I happened onto it;) I have bookmarked it and will check it out again. The best way to change is via wealth and independence. May you prosper and never stop mentoring others.|I was overjoyed to find this website. I must express my gratitude for your time because this was an amazing read! I thoroughly enjoyed reading it, and I’ve bookmarked your blog so I can check out fresh content in the future.|Hi there! If I shared your blog with my Facebook group, would that be okay? I believe there are a lot of people who would truly value your article.|منشور رائع. سأتعامل مع بعض هذه|

  2. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was curious what all is required to get set up? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very internet savvy so I’m not 100 positive. Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated. Cheers

  3. Howdy! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after reading through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely delighted I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back frequently!

  4. Halo 3: ODST 2009 first-particular person shooter
    recreation developed by Bungie. Published by Microsoft Game Studios.
    The fifth installment in the Halo franchise as a facet sport,[1] it was
    released on the Xbox 360 in September 2009. Players assume the roles of
    United Nations Space Command Marines, generally known as “Orbital Drop Shock Troopers” or ODSTs, during and after the events of Halo 2.
    In the sport’s campaign mode, gamers explore the ruined
    metropolis of new Mombasa to find what occurred to their lacking
    teammates in the midst of an alien invasion. In the
    “Firefight” multiplayer option, players battle more and more tough waves of enemies to score points and survive as long as potential; Halo three’s multiplayer is contained on a separate disc packaged with
    ODST.

  5. I conceive this website contains some really excellent info for everyone :D. “Experience is not what happens to you it’s what you do with what happens to you.” by Aldous Huxley.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *