Mokokchung, 5 May (MTNews): Addressing a press conference on Friday in Kohima, Advisor Imkong Imchen said that there are “self-contradicting flaws and undefined paradoxes in the working and implementation of Article 371A.”

 

Nagaland
Imkong L Imchen addressing the press conference on 5 May

 

Imchen said that “bare reading of Article 371A reveals no definition or meaning with regard to ‘ownership and transfer of land and its resources’ which is given in clause IV” and that it creates “difficulties and confusion in the realm of interpretation.”

 

Article 371A (IV) states that “…ownership and transfer of land and its resources, shall apply to the State of Nagaland unless the Legislative Assembly of Nagaland by a resolution so decides.”

 

According to Imchen, “there is no specific legislative power accorded to the Nagaland Legislative Assembly to legislate with respect to the special provision of Article 371(A) Clause IV” and, therefore, this unexplained ‘ambiguity and flaw’ gave rise to never ending confusion.

 

“By all indications, it is observed that Article 371(A) does not per se provide blanket protection and safeguards to its special provisions,” he reiterated.

 

He expressed that it was a ‘saddening inherent flaw’ that Nagaland Legislative Assembly was not accorded the power to make its own law in the enumerated clauses of Article 371(A) and, therefore, Article 371(A) is rather a ‘protective provision’ but not an ‘enabling provision of law’ in the Constitution.

 

According to Imchen, because the Nagaland Legislative Assembly cannot legislate on the special clauses of Article 371 (A) but legislate only on the enumerated list III in the Seventh Schedule in consonance with the provision of Article 245 read with Article(s) 246, 247, 248 of the Constitution of India, the present arrangement has already made Nagaland State in the “same footing with other States in the Indian union.”

 

He then recalled how in the 1980’s legal luminaries like HM Seervai, FS Nariman, RC Sarkar and M Hidayatullah concurred that “Land and its Resources” as used in Article 371(A) Clause IV includes mines and minerals.

 

Therefore, on 26 July 2010, the Nagaland Legislative Assembly passed a resolution to the effect that laws made by the Parliament on Petroleum and Natural Gas would be inapplicable in the State of Nagaland with retrospective effect, and subsequently invited “Expressions of Interest” from companies to explore and exploit the 11 oil and gas fields it identified across 11 districts in the State.

 

However, he pointed out that this legislative initiative by the Government of Nagaland was declared “unconstitutional and invalid” by the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs by its Office Memorandum dated 23-05-2012 which stated:

 

“The Union Ministry is of the considered view that Article 371A (a) does not confer legislative power to the legislative Assembly of Nagaland on regulation and development of mineral oil. The power to make law in respect of subjects covered under List-I of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution including entry 53 of List-I, rests with the Parliament Therefore, the resolution passed by the Nagaland Assembly in July, 2010 is unconstitutional and invalid”.

 

Imchen called the above ‘unilateral’ office memorandum ‘saddening’ because the Nagaland Legislative assembly has never approved the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act 1957 as an applicable statutory law till date and, therefore, the Central government stating that the NLA has “bypassed entry 53 of List-I of the Seventh Schedule and the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act 1957” is “palpably erroneous, incurably not tenable and manifestly arbitrary.”

 

In this regard, he viewed that Article 371 (A) more particularly clause 4 which envisages ownership and transfer of land and its resources has from the beginning till now ‘failed’ and has “tormented down to a non-est bottomless pit.”

 

 

Also read: Subjective critic on Article 371(A) more particularly Clause (IV) – Ownership and Transfer of Land and its Resources: Imkong L Imchen

17 thoughts on “Imkong L Imchen points out ambiguity and flaws in implementation of Article 371A”
  1. It is perfect time to make a few plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I have read this post and if I may just I want to suggest you few interesting things or suggestions. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article. I wish to read more things approximately it!

  2. whoah this blog is wonderful i love reading your articles. Stay up the good work! You realize, many people are hunting around for this info, you can help them greatly.

  3. What i do not realize is in reality how you’re now not really a lot more smartly-liked than you may be right now. You are so intelligent. You know therefore significantly on the subject of this matter, produced me individually consider it from numerous various angles. Its like men and women don’t seem to be interested until it’s something to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs great. All the time care for it up!

  4. I’ve been exploring for a little for any high-quality articles or blog posts in this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I finally stumbled upon this site. Reading this info So i’m satisfied to show that I have a very just right uncanny feeling I came upon exactly what I needed. I so much unquestionably will make certain to don?t fail to remember this web site and give it a look on a continuing basis.

  5. It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly donate to this fantastic blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will talk about this site with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

  6. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an impatience over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again since exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase.

  7. The implementation of a constitution is crucial for establishing order and protecting citizens’ rights, much like the Dakota Johnson coat represents a commitment to timeless fashion. Just as the coat reflects individual style and sophistication, a well-implemented constitution embodies the principles of justice and equality that shape a society’s identity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *