It is often said that knowledge is power. But what happens when knowledge exists without the power to act on it? In Naga society, one of the gravest issues we face today is the widespread awareness of discrepancies in government-funded development projects, yet an overwhelming sense of helplessness to challenge them.
Instances of corruption, favoritism, and misallocation of resources are not hidden secrets. Many people are well aware of projects that exist only on paper, roads that deteriorate before their completion, and funds that never reach their intended beneficiaries. Yet, despite this knowledge, meaningful action remains elusive. The question is: Why?
One major factor is the absence of collective will. While a few courageous individuals and organizations dare to expose and oppose such malpractices, their efforts are often met with threats, indifference, or systemic resistance. Without widespread public backing, these voices remain isolated and, in many cases, are silenced. This creates a dangerous precedent where wrongdoing continues unchecked, eroding trust in institutions and deepening societal cynicism.
Fear is another deterrent. Those who speak out against corruption often face intimidation, social ostracization, or even violence. When the very system meant to protect the people instead shields wrongdoers, it creates an environment where silence becomes the safer option. In such a scenario, knowledge alone is not enough—it must be paired with courage and solidarity.
For real change to occur, knowledge must be democratized and transformed into collective action. The responsibility does not lie with a few whistleblowers alone. A larger section of society must not only recognize the truth but also demand accountability. This requires a shift in mindset—one that prioritizes transparency, values ethical leadership, and refuses to normalize corruption.
The battle against systemic failures is not an easy one, but neither is it unwinnable. When knowledge is combined with the will to act, it becomes a formidable force. The real question is: Will we allow knowledge to remain powerless, or will we, as a society, finally reclaim the power that comes with it?