For years, waste management in Nagaland has largely been addressed through awareness campaigns and public appeals.

Cleanliness drives were organised, villages were encouraged to reduce waste, and municipal bodies repeatedly urged households to segregate garbage.

However, implementation has often remained uneven, with challenges linked to infrastructure, collection systems and monitoring capacity.

Recent Home Department notifications directing towns and villages across Nagaland to implement four-stream segregation of waste under the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026 shows a renewed administrative push on compliance.

Under the directive, households are required to separate waste into wet waste, dry waste, sanitary waste and household hazardous waste. District administrations have been instructed to coordinate implementation with village authorities and concerned departments.

The notification comes in the backdrop of broader changes in India’s waste-management framework.

The Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026, which came into force on April 1, strengthen requirements for segregation at source and expand responsibilities of waste generators. The rules also include provisions for environmental compensation in cases of non-compliance.

While the “Polluter Pays” principle has long existed in environmental law, its application within waste-management enforcement has gained greater emphasis in recent years.

In May, the Supreme Court issued directions to strengthen implementation of waste-management laws, including measures to enhance the role of district administrations in monitoring compliance under the Environment Protection Act, 1986.

The SC directives reflect a push towards a “polluter responsibility” approach, where waste generators are required to take greater accountability for segregation, processing and disposal.

SC has assigned responsibilities across levels of government, including chief secretaries of states and Union Territories, who are tasked with monitoring implementation, waste compliance, legacy waste remediation, plastic waste management and registration of bulk waste generators. It has also cautioned ministries against merely forwarding state reports, directing them instead to scrutinise and certify compliance before submission.

The secretaries of the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj, the Union Ministry of Rural Development, and the Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation have all been assigned specific reporting and monitoring obligations.

Importantly, SC has cautioned ministries against merely forwarding reports from states. Instead, it has directed them to scrutinise, certify and submit assessed compliance reports before SC.

The order also recognises that waste management cannot succeed through enforcement alone. It addresses systemic constraints such as financing, manpower and institutional capacity.

SC has directed states to review manpower gaps in urban and rural local bodies and create dedicated sanitation and SWM cadres wherever required.

It has also encouraged convergence of financing through Swachh Bharat Mission-Urban, Swachh Bharat Mission-Grameen, Finance Commission grants, corporate social responsibility support, public-private partnership projects and urban challenge fund mechanisms.

ALSO READ | Mokokchung’s MRF processes 15 tonnes of plastic in 5 years, operates only part-time due to limited waste generation

Importantly, SC has also linked SWM performance to governance incentives and disincentives. States have been directed to prioritise grants for performing local bodies while imposing penalties on defaulting ones.

For Nagaland, waste management has been under regulatory attention in recent years.

In 2022, the National Green Tribunal imposed environmental compensation of Rs 200 crore on the state over deficiencies in solid and liquid waste management and directed that the amount be utilised for waste-processing infrastructure and related facilities.

The tribunal had noted gaps in scientific waste handling and processing systems at the time.

The latest Home Department notification does not refer to either the Supreme Court directions or the NGT order.

However, it comes at a time when waste-management regulation is increasingly focused on stricter compliance, monitoring and accountability mechanisms.

Whether the new segregation system leads to effective implementation will depend on ground-level capacity, including waste collection systems, transport infrastructure and processing facilities.

Many villages and towns in the state continue to face operational challenges in managing solid waste effectively.

For now, the directive adds another layer to ongoing efforts to strengthen waste- management practices in Nagaland. (With inputs from Down to Earth)

 

MT