Nagaland AHMs: Addressing the Seniority Court Case with Assertiveness

The ongoing court case regarding the seniority dispute among the 26 Assistant Headmasters (AHMs) and other respondent AHMs in Nagaland demands immediate and decisive action. It is critical to uphold the principle that juniors cannot surpass seniors,a fundamental legal tenet that must not be compromised. If the trend of protracted legal battles continues, there is a risk forcing current AHMs in Nagaland into premature retirement, which would have detrimental effects on our education system.

We must recognize that “every family has a black sheep,” highlighting that every group inevitably includes individuals whose actions may be counterproductive.

As Martin Luther King Jr. astutely observed, there is a crucial distinction between just and unjust laws. He stated, “One may well ask: ‘How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?’ The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws.” We not only have a legal obligation but also a moral imperative to uphold just laws. Similarly, as St. Augustine affirmed, “an unjust law is no law at all.” We must prioritize justice and integrity relentlessly in all our endeavors.

In light of these circumstances, I call on the current serving AHMs to resolve this internal conflict swiftly and amicably. This is essential for the benefit of the entire education system in Nagaland, ensuring that every individual enjoys equal rights and opportunities regarding promotions and stability. It is time to act decisively for the greater good.

(ASHENTO MAGH)
Senior Citizen of
Sewanu Village
Dist: Tseminyu